Do
you agree or disagree with the death penalty? If you agree, why? If you
disagree, what do you propose we do instead?
In response to this question, I have composed the following essay
below:
The
death penalty has always been a tricky subject. There has always been division
over the subject even when it comes to the most upright and moral citizens.
However,
I for one would propose that it is a subject that is too heavy a punishment, no
matter the crime. In essence, it would seem that the law becomes guilty of the
crime it wishes to punish with the death penalty-murder. The only difference is
public opinion largely rests heavily on the side of justice (although this is
not always the case).
So,
if the death penalty isn’t the answer, then what is? Clearly, the answer lies
all around us—in the vast, largely unused natural resources of the Earth around
us: the seas and oceans. These pristine conditions are prime for building the
largest, most secure, self-contained prison system in the world.
Like
the Jules Verne novel 20,000 Leagues
Under the Sea, inmates could grow and harvest their own vegetation and hunt
sea life for food. Desalination systems could convert salt water to fresh water
for drinking.
As
for location, the prisons could be scattered throughout the oceans in the most
remote corners of the earth. Placed far from standard shipping lanes, these
Underwater Prisons would serve not only to keep prisoners far from public eye,
but also protect them from escaping. Furthermore, if they did manage to escape,
where would they go? Without supplies or any kind of plan, they would easily
die within a few days.
Now,
this raises a valid question: how many millions of tax dollars would be spent
on such an astronomically expensive venture? Rather than giving inmates menial
tasks such as manufacturing wallets or license plates, instead let them take
part in ‘Deep Sea Mining’. While serving out their life sentences and not being
put to death, they could pay their own expenses for first the construction of
the underwater prisons and then their maintenance by mining the minerals of the
deep.
This
may seem like cruel and unusual punishment for anybody; let us not forget however, who would be serving in these
underwater prisons—murderers. These are the people that would’ve previously
been sentenced to death row. However, with this alternative solution, it is a
win-win situation for both parties involved. For the judicial system, justice
is served, and for the prisoners they get to live another day. Furthermore, the
system would be self-sustaining, which is something that the present day prison
system cannot claim.
This
is my alternative theory, and I believe while it may not in many ways be the
most realistic option, it is fresh, imaginative, and deserves consideration.
Thank you.
This blog post is an official entry for the Law Blogger's Scholarship, sponsored by The Law Office of Joshua Pond.
This blog post is an official entry for the Law Blogger's Scholarship, sponsored by The Law Office of Joshua Pond.
No comments:
Post a Comment